<div dir="ltr">On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Matthew Flaschen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mflaschen@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">mflaschen@wikimedia.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 05/22/2015 06:12 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Currently, the Search & Discovery department is working on 3 projects:<br>
Cirrus/text search, maps, and Wikidata Query Service. Of those, I think<br>
only one is actually "mediawiki" work, which is part of what inspired my<br>
question.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
On what basis? Maps and Wikidata are also technical projects, using PostgreSQL, OSM software, WikiBase, graph software, etc. I don't see why they would be considered unrelated to MediaWiki software.<span class=""><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This could just be my inexperience here. To me, maps and wikidata are clearly wikimedia software, but do not seem to be mediawiki software. They are "related" to mediawiki, but I'm not sure what that should mean. It sounds like you define mediawiki as being much broader than I was thinking.<br><br></div><div>Thanks for continuing the conversation. <br></div><div> <span class=""></span><br></div>Kevin<br><br></div></div></div>