[teampractices] Patch review culture of Wikimedia teams

[Andre Klapper]

Hej,

https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101686 lists "Prioritization / weak
open source culture: more pressure to write new code than to review
patches contributed."

Apart from whether that statement is true or not:
Does the Team Practices Group encourage regular Gerrit patch backlog
grooming? If so, how, and is there any documentation available, or even
data which teams perform better or worse? Is there any differentiation
between "internal" patches by team members vs. contributed patches?
Or is this out of scope for TPG?

Thanks a lot!
andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/