[teampractices] "Roadmap" project in Phabricator
Andre Klapper
aklapper at wikimedia.org
Tue Feb 24 10:32:45 UTC 2015
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 23:47 -0800, Erik Moeller wrote:
> I propose a "Roadmap" project in Phabricator. Tasks in this project
> would be typically epics with rough anticipated calendar-level
> delivery dates and clear, understandable task descriptions.
> Tasks would be arranged on a Phabricator workboard like so:
> February 2015: Features
> February 2015: Platform
> February 2015: Apps
If tasks are really "typically epics", there's an existing project with
an unused workboard: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/epic/
Is there a good enough reason to not use that workboard (plus keeping
epics that are way too "epic" in the Backlog column)?
How many Roadmap items will *not* be epics?
Having another project "Roadmap" with >50% of its tasks being already
part of the "Epic" project sounds like potential duplication.
Plus keeping track of epics might be one of Wikimedia's problems and I
don't think that currently anyone regularly looks at the list of open
"Epic" tasks anyway. I'm happy to be proven wrong.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
More information about the teampractices
mailing list