[teampractices] REMINDER: Project management tools review: Help shorten the list of candidates

[Katie Horn]

Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification!

-Katie


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Greg Grossmeier <greg at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> <quote name="Steven Walling" date="2014-03-14" time="12:42:52 -0700">
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Katie Horn <khorn at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I see that "gerrit" is listed under "status quo", which seems to imply
> > > that replacing gerrit is, if not on the table, then hovering near the
> > > table.
> > >
> > > Is that an accurate implication? If so, I didn't realize that the
> scope of
> > > this discussion extended to code review tools as well as PM tools, and
> so
> > > have probably vastly underrepresented some things in the previous
> requests
> > > for team information.
> > >
> >
> > It basically only within scope if Phabricator is one of our strongly
> > considered options (which it is). Most of the other tools listed focus
> more
> > on issues/project management, but Phabricator also potentially replaces
> the
> > code review and repository viewing portions of our toolkit.
>
> Which then has mega benefits with everything being in the same place....
> ohmygoshthepossibilities
>
>
> --
> | Greg Grossmeier            GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
> | identi.ca: @greg                A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |
>
> _______________________________________________
> teampractices mailing list
> teampractices at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/teampractices/attachments/20140314/326b34a3/attachment-0001.html>