[teampractices] Scrum-y tools based on BZ (was Re: Scrumbu.gs)

[Matthew Flaschen]

On 10/31/2013 03:51 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Flaschen
> <mflaschen at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> I don't think we should get into weird substitutions just because people are
>> edit warring.
>
> Is there any good reason to reopen bugs, e.g. commenting functionality
> being lost? If not I agree - this should just be a matter of policy.

No, you can comment on a closed bug.  E.g. see 
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47296 .  It's a WONTFIX, 
but the comment field is there as normal.

I agree it should be a policy, and it would be even better to have it 
written.

Matt Flaschen