[QA] Browser testing user satisfaction survey
James Forrester
jforrester at wikimedia.org
Fri Sep 2 17:42:38 UTC 2016
Interesting patterns there.
Is the plan to follow-up with these with particular actions? That said, it
seems to me a bit muddy as to what activities would best serve the
responses. I suppose education/support work for those that don't feel they
know *e.g.* how to use the rake/grunt entry points, or where to start on
fixing flaky cucumber tests?
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 at 03:15 Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Survey report is now available:
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Browser_testing/User_satisfaction_survey
>
> Questions? Comments?
>
> Željko
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> In order to improve browser testing tools, release engineering team has
>> created browser testing user satisfaction survey:
>>
>> https://goo.gl/xS6mmV
>>
>> It should take you up to 5 minutes. Most of the questions have simple 5
>> level linear scale. There are 5 sections, and the last question in each
>> section will be free form text field, so you can leave comments on anything
>> we forgot to ask.
>>
>> For details about the survey, feel free to take a look at phabricator
>> task:
>>
>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T131123
>>
>> Željko
>>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
--
James D. Forrester
Lead Product Manager, Editing
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester at wikimedia.org
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l> |
@jdforrester
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20160902/adc942b1/attachment.html>
More information about the QA
mailing list