[QA] Quick Check

[ManojVasanth]

It was indeed invisible. I was going through the wikis after long time and
looking for document related to deployment

thanks
ManojKK

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Jon Robson <jrobson at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Off topic but these banners are near invisible to me and I'm sure many
> others.
>
> This problem has bit me before when I followed an outdated guide. Can we
> make them more obvious or revisit them altogether(e.g. Redirect / replace
> entire page with link to old revision)?
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, 5:56 a.m. Andre Klapper, <aklapper at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 10:42 +0530, ManojVasanth wrote:
>> > is this link ( pages t.. ) broken? @ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Q
>> > uality_Assurance . Or is it just a invalid linking?.
>>
>> The search link is technically correct, however there are zero results
>> nowadays. :) See the header of the page: "This MediaWiki page is
>> inactive and kept for historical interest."
>>
>> andre
>> --
>> Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QA mailing list
>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20161208/2f62823c/attachment.html>