[QA] QA test reports on mobile-l

[Arthur Richards]

Chris (or someone else from QA), it appears that you removed mobile-tech
from the failure emails as well as mobile-l. Can you please resubscribe
mobile-tech? Otherwise, we have no idea when tests are failing. Thanks to
Jon for pointing out the eerie silence we've had over the last couple of
weeks :)


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Chris McMahon <cmcmahon at wikimedia.org>wrote:

>
> Done.
>
> BTW, failures in Chrome since yesterday seem to be because of
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/113997/ , if you'd like to merge that.
>   It's an interesting race condition, see
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61504
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Juliusz Gonera <jgonera at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>>  She probably wouldn't, but that's a separate issue ;)
>>
>> Chris, can we disable the e-mails to mobile-l at lists.wikimedia.org for
>> now?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/14/2014 06:05 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
>>
>> Agreed.
>> In terms of mobile-l would you mother understand how to sign up it in the
>> first place...?
>> Anyway I should get back to vacation. ;)
>> On 14 Feb 2014 21:52, "Juliusz Gonera" <jgonera at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  Also, I think there are better ways of showing something's failing...
>>> Many open source projects on GitHub use a small Travis badge. Maybe we
>>> could have something similar?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/14/2014 05:43 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
>>>
>>> I worry about us making anything private. I'd rather we fixed the root
>>> problem. I think we already have an unhealthy obsession with using
>>> mobile-tech that Yuvi has brought up numerous times and I'd love us to use
>>> mobile-l more as we are alienating a large audience of potential
>>> contributors.
>>>
>>> The majority of false positives seem to be related to timeouts. Can we
>>> not simply increase the default timeout from 5s to 10s to improve things
>>> since beta labs is unstable and slow and this seems to be the main cause?
>>>
>>> Ideally we should be aiming to get these emails as accurate as possible
>>> and think about adding a call to action on them "help us fix this issue -
>>> submit a patch now!"
>>> On 13 Feb 2014 18:37, "Arthur Richards" <arichards at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with this - at least until we drastically reduce the number of
>>>> false positive failures.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Juliusz Gonera <jgonera at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think we should send them only to mobile-tech, at least for now,
>>>>> until we figure out some remaining issues. Right now our public mobile-l
>>>>> list is getting spammed with them quite a lot. Opinions?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Juliusz
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Arthur Richards
>>>> Software Engineer, Mobile
>>>> [[User:Awjrichards]]
>>>> IRC: awjr
>>>> +1-415-839-6885 x6687 <%2B1-415-839-6885%20x6687>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Arthur Richards
Software Engineer, Mobile
[[User:Awjrichards]]
IRC: awjr
+1-415-839-6885 x6687
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140304/96e44676/attachment-0001.html>