[QA] RVM and/or rbenv

Nikolas Everett neverett at wikimedia.org
Sun Jun 29 01:39:01 UTC 2014


For my part I don't know enough to have an opinion other than that we need
something to do the dependency management and isolation. I don't care which
one. I know puppet has an rbenv patch merged or waiting.
On Jun 28, 2014 2:52 PM, "Chris McMahon" <christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Ċ½eljko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> This is mostly question for Dan Duvall, but I wanted to ask it in
>> public, so others could contribute too.
>>
>> Dan, what are you thoughts about RVM[1] and rbenv[2]? Should we use one
>> or the other exclusively? Or are there times when one or the other is the
>> better choice?
>>
>> Are there other options?
>>
>> We are using RVM for browser tests, mostly because at the time we were
>> starting the project I did not know about any other Ruby
>> version/environment managers.
>>
>
>  As I recall, it was also because I had recommendations from Ruby experts
> at places like Groupon and Leandog who recommended RVM at the time.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140628/7b0d1147/attachment.html>


More information about the QA mailing list