[QA] mediawiki-selenium Ruby gem

[Chris McMahon]

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Rachel Thomas <rachelqa99 at gmail.com> wrote:

> How about mediawiki-selenium-library ?
>

We should conform to the sort of conventions we see at
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/ and (the same repos, but
less easy to read at this level) https://github.com/wikimedia


>
>
> --Rachel
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Chris McMahon <cmcmahon at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is mediawiki-selenium a good name for the repository and Ruby gem?
>>> Anybody has another idea? It does not have to be a good idea, any old idea
>>> will do. :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think it is.  Looking at the /mediawiki source tree, /mediawiki/vagrant
>> would be a similar repo.  The alternative would be
>> mediawiki/tools/selenium, but I prefer /mediawiki/selenium.
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QA mailing list
>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20131004/c5891f86/attachment.html>