[Pywikipedia-l] Rewrite: porting status
Liangent
liangent at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 09:53:52 UTC 2009
is pywikibot.script.foo.Particularclass always useful, stable and
robust enough for other scripts to use? if it is, i think we can split
it out and move it to somewhere like
pywikibot.utils.foo.Particularclass
On 4/19/09, Nicolas Dumazet <nicdumz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/14 Russell Blau <russblau at imapmail.org>
>>
>> Why not put suggested categories on the botwiki page?
>
>
> Will do, when I'll find time for that.
>
>
>> BTW, I'd really like
>> to move scripts/ back under the pywikibot/ package; do you object?
>
>
> No strong objections. I'm just wondering why would you want to do that... :)
>
> I personally liked the idea of clearly separating the core module used for
> mediawiki editing, and the "user" scripts we wrote from this core module.
> * The former is a set of primitives that any users are likely to need, the
> latter contains a lot of different scripts that are not necessary for
> creating a new mediawiki bot
> * From a developer perspective, it's very different to maintain core scripts
> or to modify user scripts. Someone with very little knowledge of the
> implementation of the core module can work to improve user scripts. A broken
> user script only stops this particular script from working; a broken core
> feature is likely to cause much more damage, etc...
>
> But maybe that distinction is not important enough to get the user scripts
> out of the pywikibot bot module. As Merlijn (valhallasw) said, it might also
> be useful to be able to import pywikibot.script.foo.Particularclass from
> time to time.
>
> Can we get your input Russell? =)
>
> --
> Nicolas Dumazet — NicDumZ [ nɪk.d̪ymz ]
>
More information about the Pywikipedia-l
mailing list