[Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution?

David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com
Thu Feb 10 16:58:25 UTC 2011


(to list as well)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>
Date: 10 February 2011 16:58
Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution?
To: "Haim (Howard) Roman" <roman at jct.ac.il>


On 10 February 2011 16:46, Haim (Howard) Roman <roman at jct.ac.il> wrote:

> What do you mean by "good"?  A full-fledged office suite, e.g. Open or MS?
> Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or
> templates?


Just the editing window itself, so they never need to see wikitext.


> As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for relatively simple
> formatting.  I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to
> FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables.  It does a pretty good job, and
> allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes.


I shall give that a non-techie testing then!


- d.



More information about the MediaWiki-l mailing list