> But they say that mediawiki user right management
is not enough powerful for us.
And they are right to say that. ("MediaWiki is not
designed to be a CMS, or to protect sensitive data....)
Well... they're correct that MediaWiki's rights management isn't very
powerful, but it might still be powerful "enough" for many uses.
In a typical corporation, a tremendous amount of information does not need to be
access-controlled. Wikis are excellent for this kind of information.
Additionally, there is information that people THINK needs to be access-controlled, but
doesn't really need it. If you educate people about the MediaWiki "watch"
feature -- that people can be notified instantly if someone messes with their articles --
that may be enough to satisfy people.
Finally, you have the small amount of information that truly needs tight access control:
legal documents, financial documents, Human Resources official policies, etc. Buy a
heavyweight CMS for that, and use lightweight MediaWiki for the rest!
DanB