[Mediawiki-l] Subpages in main namespace?
Rick DeNatale
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Thu Mar 23 00:01:47 UTC 2006
On 3/22/06, Rich Morin <rdm at cfcl.com> wrote:
> At 3:18 PM -0800 3/22/06, Jan Steinman wrote:
> > Human knowledge is rife with hierarchies -- not because
> > they are "natural," but because humans invented the model.
>
> I agree somewhat with this, but there are many situations in
> which the universe enforces hierarchical organization. For
> example, if you start trying to organize physical items, you
> soon run into the problem that an item can only be in one
> category (ie, container) at a time. However, that container
> (eg, a drawer) can be contained in another (eg, a cabinet).
Be careful not to confuse containment with categorization.
Hierarchies do tend to be suited for containment modeling. They don't
do so well with categorization.
> I believe that much of humans' use of hierarchies stems from
> this interaction between a desire to organize and the limits
> of the physical universe.
I believe that one of Lakov's observations was that people tend to
agree more on carving the world up into leaf level categories; that's
a tree and that's a bird; but that differences tend to crop up when
making hierarchies of those basic categories, making abstractions.
What seems to one person to be a perfectly natural hierarchical
structure to the universe, handed down on stone tablets by the diety,
may turn out to be completely unintuitive to another particularly one
raised in a different culture or with a different native language.
Getting to Jan's allusion to Maslov, I don't think that either
hierarchies or screws are evil. Although a nail can serve in some of
the same roles as a screw and vice versa, it's not always completely
obvious when such a usage has crossed the line. It's certainly best
to know when to use one vs the other, and when to switch.
--
Rick DeNatale
Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site
http://www.mercuryspacecraft.com/
More information about the MediaWiki-l
mailing list