As for the flower, when I look at the new you propose and the old, the old
to me looks much more natural - the new looks too synthesised.
The whole point of the brackets is surely that they ARE square and ordinary.
If you start making them round, it loses all the not-so-subtle symbolism.
Not unless in MediaWiki 2.0 links are expressed as ((mylink))?
Hugh
"Erik Moeller" <eloquence(a)gmail.com> wrote in
message news:b80736c80606160107y1a2ae350s317940a0e5558b5b@mail.gmail.com...
As MediaWiki 2.0 is slowly moving closer, I think we
should consider
replacing the current logo. The problems I have with it (and I say
that as its co-designer) are that the colors feel washed out, the
flower is asymmetrical, and the square brackets look just a tad bit
too square and ordinary.
Erik