I don't see this as the "best attitude," but rather the wiki
philosophy. And I know we're not in disagreement here, but it's a
matter of the "best tool for the job." Those wanting correct and
proper looking content probably need to look elsewhere. There are
plenty of CMSes out there to suit people's needs.
I love the idea I can write what I KNOW and have someone else make
sure it looks right. I don't pretend this excuses me from learning,
or trying, but I can still make a stab without worrying about being
so drastically incorrect that others will condemn my contributions.
This can happen as well, but not because the presentation was off.
And this is how I learn. I've made maybe 20 posts to wikipedia. I
don't think I disagree with ANY of the changes to my posts. And I've
tried to take into account previous modifications for my future
contributions every time. But again, I don't sweat it if I'm off.
I take pride in someone else thinking my content worth making
"right," and the content persevering.
I also take glee in correcting others' and seeing my corrections
stand. This happens less often (but only because I too often lack
conviction).
Maybe it's my iron ego. I put it out there, do what you will.
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:09 PM, David Pace wrote:
On 8/8/06, Christopher Jorgensen
<cjorgensen(a)mac.com> wrote:
I see this as a strength. I can add content without having to
question, "Is it EXACTLY correct?" Otherwise I wouldn't participate.
Expecting people to "get it right" or to learn a "WYSIWYG" editor is
silly. Throw it up there! Let the type A personalities make it
"right." This way those of us with something to contribute can, and
those wanting to make sure the color is within the lines can. Win
win!
I think this is the best attitude to take and it is definitely the
attitude
I would like my user base to adopt. The input doesn't have to be
perfect,
just get the information in there and those who take the initiative
will
clean it up and make it shine.