[Labs-l] Disruptive Tools NFS maintenance on 11/2/2016

[John]

Without seeing your planned schedule, timelines, and task lists its
difficult to make any assessments/judgements. I made an open ended question
trying to get some of that. I wasn't assuming any kind of bad faith, just
that planned IT outages of more than 24 hours is normally unheard of unless
there is critical hardware failures. I also commented that there may
be extenuating
circumstances that we are unaware of that would better establish the need
for the prolonged outage.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Yuvi Panda <yuvipanda at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:19 AM, John <phoenixoverride at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not to be crass, but why do you need a 48 hour complete outage? with
> proper
> > planning it shouldn't take more than a few hours unless there are
> > extenuating circumstances.
>
> Sorry, but this *is* crass, and assumes we aren't doing proper
> planning. Please AGF (and Assume Competence), and ask specific
> questions you might have.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20161021/78d78adb/attachment.html>