[Labs-l] Questions regarding the Labs Terms of use
Ricordisamoa
ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org
Fri Mar 13 22:24:37 UTC 2015
Il 13/03/2015 19:38, Stephen LaPorte ha scritto:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Ricordisamoa
> <ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org <mailto:ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org>>
> wrote:
>
> What about tools and services made up of software themselves? Do
> they have to be Open Source?
>
>
> Yes, all the software that we run on labs should be open source
> (including tools). If there is a situation that justifies running
> proprietary software, then we can discuss that with the Labs admins to
> see if it's legal and appropriate. There is a strong preference to
> avoid exceptions, as open source code will be easier to run and
> maintain long term.
>
> Strictly speaking, do the Terms of use require that all code be
> made available to the public?
>
>
> It's not a strict requirement in the TOU that software is publicly
> available. But non-public code may not be appropriate for a few
> practical and policy reasons that Tim and Ryan explained well.
Thanks for your statement. Can you please have the wikitech.org page
updated by an administrator?
>
> --
> Stephen LaPorte
> Legal Counsel
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> /NOTICE: As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal and
> ethical reasons, I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer
> for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal
> capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>./
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20150313/c3c0ce86/attachment.html>
More information about the Labs-l
mailing list