[Labs-l] Questions regarding the Labs Terms of use

John phoenixoverride at gmail.com
Fri Mar 13 16:23:50 UTC 2015


Code can be under a free license, but not released to general public. I
often help others out, or give them small snippets of my code base when it
is needed. However I will not publicly publish my code. I keep things under
a secure private code repository because I really dont want to have to deal
with the fallout if I accidentally include credentials or some other
non-public data. One of the other reasons is, I dont write most of my code
for the general public to use, if someone who doesnt know what they are
doing screws up, I dont want my code responsible for crashing a wiki. (Yes
it is possible, Ive dont it before by accident.)

I will not be handing out copies of my code to anyone who asks. But I will
review requests, and if Im hit by a bus and can no longer support my tools
then and only then will tools admins step in.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy Baron <jeremy at tuxmachine.com>
wrote:

> On Mar 13, 2015 10:49 AM, "Ricordisamoa" <ricordisamoa at openmailbox.org>
> wrote:
> > What about tools and services made up of software themselves? Do they
> have to be Open Source?
>
> What are "tools and services made up of software themselves"? are there
> "tools and services" not made up of software?
>
> On Mar 13, 2015 10:58 AM, "John" <phoenixoverride at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's debatable. Released under a free license vs publicly available.
>
> [citation needed]
>
> > My code is not published for several reasons
>
> Name them?
>
> -Jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20150313/0948eace/attachment.html>


More information about the Labs-l mailing list