[Labs-l] [Analytics] User registration date on DB replicas

Felipe Ortega glimmer_phoenix at yahoo.es
Fri Feb 14 11:05:33 UTC 2014


Hi Oliver,

Thanks a lot. Then, I look forward to the confirmation and implementation of this feature. In case it's better to open a new issue on bugzilla or any other action on my side (lend a hand with value reviewing/testing) just let me know.

Regards,
Felipe.




El Jueves 13 de febrero de 2014 18:37, Oliver Keyes <okeyes at wikimedia.org> escribió:
 
I can't see a reason for the data to not be available; the deficiencies were (iirc) pre-2004-ish. It's actually really trivial to tell when they started, because the "guesstimates" are the timestamp of the first revision associated with the user.
>
>So I'm not sure that this was a deliberate design decision - and if it was, I can't imagine they'd nullify the entire field just because of some inaccuracies a decade ago ;p.
>
>
>
>
>On 13 February 2014 09:13, Felipe Ortega <glimmer_phoenix at yahoo.es> wrote:
>
>Thanks, Nemo.
>>
>>It is a shame. Does this means that this information is also inaccurate for users created after r12207 (Dec. 2005) ? At least, it would be useful to compare any differences between the periods 2006-2008 and 2009-present.
>>
>>In fact, I remember that this information was available in the DB replicas in Toolserver. But I haven't had the chance to check against log entries, yet.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Felipe.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>El Jueves 13 de febrero de 2014 15:17, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com> escribió:
>> 
>>Felipe Ortega, 13/02/2014 14:57:
>>>
>>>> My question is: are there any reasons for redacting this (apparently
>>>> public) info? I can't figure out why this could be sensitive data.
>>>
>>>It's not redacted, it simply never existed. There aren't even log 
>>>entries for old registrations; on some wiki(s) the field was populated 
>>>with guesstimates.
>>>See also https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 , 
>>>https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22097 depends on it/is a 
>>>duplicate.
>>>
>>>Nemo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Analytics mailing list
>>Analytics at lists.wikimedia.org
>>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Oliver Keyes
>Product Analyst
>Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20140214/438545d7/attachment.html>


More information about the Labs-l mailing list