[Labs-l] A proposal for better tool discoverability

[Magog The Ogre]

Question: will the tool choke and/or emit unwanted error messages if it
finds JSON fields it doesn't recognize? Because these are a sneaky way to
include comments (http://stackoverflow.com/q/244858).

Also, Hay, you are a coding, documentation, and implementation genius. :-)

On Friday, August 15, 2014, TParis <tparis.wiki at gmail.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tparis.wiki at gmail.com');>> wrote:

> Might also be useful to know if a tool has an API and if the source code
> is viewable.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: labs-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> labs-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of svetlana
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:52 PM
> To: labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Labs-l] A proposal for better tool discoverability
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, at 22:59, Hay (Husky) wrote:
> > Hey Hedonil,
> > thanks for the suggestion for a 'repository' property, i've added
> > that. Adding it now adds a 'source available' link in the tool card,
> > and also groups them in a special category.
> >
> > -- Hay
>
> Maybe also indicate a tool source code license? Would be adorable
>
> svetlana
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20140815/5f972cce/attachment.html>