[Labs-l] NFS issues, please deploy fire

[Daniel Friesen]

I'm blissfully awaiting the day that Ceph is declared stable.

~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]

On 12-09-14 12:24 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Actually, there are issues with gluster which isn't much better, so
> any alternative to gluster or nfs would be nice
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Damian Zaremba
> <damian at damianzaremba.co.uk> wrote:
>> As seen on a few instances today;
>> [  825.247230] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
>> [463494.148261] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
>> [1442873.402458] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
>>
>> Logins also seem to be rather laggy, ganglia shows spiky cpu on the nfs
>> instance.
>>
>> Any chance of moving home dirs over to the same cluster as project storage
>> any time soon?
>>
>> NFS isn't really scalable in the current state and is rather laggy randomly,
>> also if that instance where to die everyone would be screwed.
>>
>> Considering that opening up registration also potentially increases active
>> users, it might be an idea to solve the issue before it seriously becomes
>> one and we have a whole gluster like downtime.
>>
>> TL;DR NFS should DIAF and we should use gluster/ceph for user data.
>>
>> Damian
>> --
>> Damian Zaremba
>> http://about.me/damianzaremba
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Labs-l mailing list
>> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l