[Labs-l] ram

[Ryan Lane]

A size between tiny and small would likely be good. The compute nodes
we are eventually moving to have some incredibly high amount of ram
though, so I don't think we should worry too much about it.

The storage space I'm not too worried about. I'm more than happy with
us over allocating storage, as we can just track usage over time.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 27, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Petr Bena <benapetr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have checked the instances and found out that we have approximately 50% of all allocated ram unused
>
> I think it would make sense to add 2 additional types:
>
> - with 1gb of ram and 10gb of storage mounted as /
> - with 2 gb of ram and 80gb or storage as /mnt and 10 gb of storage as /
>
> I think people should use tiny more, but current tiny is too small, especially storage is. What do you think? Maybe it would help us utilize resources better. There are too many instances which are not using even 10% of allocated space, most of them don't use /mnt at all
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l