[Foundation-l] Blink tag jokes are now obsolete.

Béria Lima berialima at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 01:17:55 UTC 2012


>
> *In future, I suggest you pay more attention rather than asking such
> ill-informed questions. I wasn't involved in the tests - everything I've
> said in this email came from the reports the fundraising team published
> before and during the fundraiser. If you had bothered to read them, you
> wouldn't have had to ask. They are all on meta - I suggest you go and
> read them.
> *


Ok, maybe I'm not the right person to do this - after all, the whole high
WMF staff already send mails asking me to fuck off - and even my friends
tell I'm not the most kind person in the world, but Thomas, if you had used
that tone in any wiki I'm an adm,  you would be blocked by now. Please
moderate it. You might not like what he is saying but attack him will do
nothing for your cause.
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*


On 3 January 2012 23:00, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton em gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 4, 2012 12:44 AM, "Theo10011" <de10011 em gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton em gmail.com
> >wrote:
> > > The WMF's conclusions about what banners work best are based on
> > > extensive testing. What are yours based on?
> >
> >
> > My guts.
> >
> > BTW How have those tests worked out? You know the ones that went on for
> > months before the fundraiser to replace Jimmy.
>
> There were numerous non-Jimmy banners used during the fundraiser because
> they were tested and proved to work well. The Jimmy banners were used
> extensively too because they still perform very well in the tests,
> particularly when improved using the lessons learnt from the other banners
> that were tested.
>
> In future, I suggest you pay more attention rather than asking such
> ill-informed questions. I wasn't involved in the tests - everything I've
> said in this email came from the reports the fundraising team published
> before and during the fundraiser. If you had bothered to read them, you
> wouldn't have had to ask. They are all on meta - I suggest you go and read
> them.
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l em lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list