[Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 96, Issue 95

[phoebe ayers]

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should
>> opposing be justified /more/ than supporting?
>
> There's supposed to be a Q&A coming that will explain the supports.

That's true! Soon -- in a couple of days (everyone is traveling
today/tomorrow so it's hard to review quickly). I'll send a note when
we get it done, of course.

In the meantime, if there are any questions for us (as a board) or for
individual trustees I encourage you simply to send those along, either
to me (if you want them to go to the whole board, as I will pass them
along) or privately. That would help make sure that we can address the
questions people actually have, rather than speculating. It sounds
like people are interested in individual trustee motives. I do think
it's better if trustees individually write/talk about where they are
coming from, rather than trying to put that information in an official
document like the minutes, where everything is condensed and there is
the possibility of misrepresentation.

Nemo, thanks for sending around the notes -- that's quite helpful! I
think we have some notes that Joslyn took too, I'll see if there is
anything I can add from that (though etherpad still doesn't seem to
work well in my browser - boo.)

-- phoebe