[Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

[Phil Nash]

Fae wrote:
> On 19 September 2011 17:42, M. Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
>> A "dead human bodies" category that excludes mummies "because we're
>> not idiots" is, by definition, not neutral.
>
> I agree, sounds like the only solution is that we pour away a hefty
> chunk of those charitably donated WMF millions in a few hundred
> thousand variations of the categories and anyone that likes, say,
> Bain's version of "common sense" can read BainChildFriendlyWiki.org
> instead of the horrid open Wikipedia with it's dreadful nudity,
> mutilated bodies, heresies and images of educational and cultural
> notability.
>
> Alternatively anyone who has "common sense" can take Wikipedia for
> free and hack it about in their own time and cash in by selling it to
> schools that would like to benefit from a *guaranteed* child friendly
> and religiously tolerant (out of date) version.

Hasn't this already happened, albeit on a voluntary basis, and with free 
distribution?

http://schools-wikipedia.org/