[Foundation-l] 86% of german users disagree with the introduction of the personal image filter

Tobias Oelgarte tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com
Fri Sep 16 10:48:43 UTC 2011


That is an legal issue. We do that to comply with the law, since that 
image isn't in public domain under German jurisdiction. This has nothing 
to do with hiding perfectly legal content. Additionally an optional 
filter would not help to make it legal. Filter or no filter wouldn't 
change a thing.

Two different topics, one wrong assumption.

Tobias

Am 16.09.2011 12:39, schrieb emijrp:
> Hi all;
>
> There are more issues with images in German Wikipedia.
>
> It is funny how German Wikipedia doesn't allow images[1] (image added by
> me[2] in de:, and later removed by other[3]) because they follow the most
> restrictive copyright law from Germany, Austria and Switzerland[note 1], but
> they are now against giving people the choice to hide images.
>
> I think that we can do a nice move here. We can enable image filter in
> German Wikipedia for all those who don't want to see
> copyrighted-images-for-German-law, meanwhile allowing other people to see
> all Commons splendour. Using the image filter to improve the rights of
> readers of German Wikipedia. Very cool, right? ; )
>
> Regards,
> emijrp
>
> [1]
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Wikipedia_richtet_sich_nach_DACH-Recht
> [2] http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Knox&oldid=81377280
> [3] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Knox
>
> [note 1] I heard there are German speaking users outside Europe, right? I
> heard too that, from Germany, you can follow interwiki and see that images
> in other Wikipedias, right? So, what is the sense of that policy? Are not
> the servers in USA?
>
> 2011/9/16 Tobias Oelgarte<tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>
>
>> Dear readers
>>
>> Yesterday, on September 15th 2011, the German Wikipedia closed the poll
>> (Meinungsbild) "Einführung persönlicher Bildfilter". [1] It asked the
>> question if the personal image filter can be introduced or if it should
>> not be introduced.
>>
>> A strong majority of 86% percent voted to not allow the personal image
>> filter [2] , despite the fact that the board already decided to
>> introduce the feature.
>>
>> The questions are:
>> * Will the board or the WMF proceed with the introduction of the
>> personal image filter against the will of it's second largest community?
>> * If the WMF/board does not care about the first question. Will it
>> affect the way the personal image filter will be implemented? For
>> example: Not for all projects. A different implementation as suggested
>> inside the "image filter referendum".
>> * Will there be an attempt to follow this example and to question other
>> communities the same question?
>>
>> Greetings from
>> Tobias Oelgarte
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meinungsbilder/Einf%C3%BChrung_pers%C3%B6nlicher_Bildfilter
>> [2]
>>
>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meinungsbilder/Einf%C3%BChrung_pers%C3%B6nlicher_Bildfilter#Auswertung
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>




More information about the foundation-l mailing list