[Foundation-l] PG rating

M. Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 17:23:58 UTC 2011


Are you kidding? Pictures of mummies, a cup with a depiction of two guys
doing it that can only be noticed if you look really closely, and what is
supposed to be a depiction of intercourse but actually looks more like a
piece of stale bread? Wow.


2011/9/13 Fae <fae at wikimedia.org.uk>

> > Are there are pages on English Wikipedia that should be classified as PG?
>
> Good candidates that I have had a hand in improving are:
> # [[Gebelein predynastic mummies]] - surely gruesome close-ups of
> naked dead bodies are PG?
> # [[Warren Cup]] - explicit depiction of under-age homosexual anal sex
> in the lead.
> # [[Ain Sakhri lovers]] - depiction of penetrative heterosexual
> intercourse in the lead.
>
> The discussion of how to make Wikipedia "child-friendly" has a long
> history with no firm conclusion. Some would like to effectively censor
> massive areas of history and culture, whilst others will take any
> potential restriction as a direct challenge to the open movement.
>
> Cheers,
> Fae
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list