[Foundation-l] Personal Image Filter results announced
Béria Lima
berialima at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 08:31:38 UTC 2011
>
> *Objecting to this isn't a question of being prudish or of censorship, or
> of being anti-wiki. But if we want to attract (...) women
> editors, editors from outside the majority cultures on Wikipedia (...) this
> kind of thing is obviously very off-putting. So we risk limiting our reach
> by not dealing with it.
> *
Speak for yourself. Like i told before in Gender Gap list, remove the
"porn/naked" images will not solve gender gap. And about culture - forgive
me - but the only people who seems concerned about remove those images from
wiki are AFAIS american.
*Béria Lima*
(PS.: IF you want to see some "really" bad naked/porn images, who shouldn't
be in Wikipédia, talk with a Commons admin - even a female admin like me saw
thinks 100 times worst than a naked girl showing her 8 months pregancy belly
that you are complaining so much
about<http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-September/001308.html>
)
On 8 September 2011 04:58, Sarah <slimvirgin em gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 05:35, Yann Forget <yannfo em gmail.com> wrote:
> > But we do peer review images after they have been uploaded on Commons
> > or Wikipedia.
> >
> > It seems that, 10 years after Wikipedia and its sisters have been
> > created, you still do not understand that there are wikis.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Yann
> >
> Yann, I yesterday looked at the Veganism article, only to find a
> photograph in the infobox, not of yummy tofu scramble as before, but a
> close-up of a woman's genitals, with a vibrator and what looked like a
> man's fingers. I clicked on it, and saw it was being hosted by the
> Wikimedia Foundation, uploaded from Flickr by the Flickr upload bot.
>
> Objecting to this isn't a question of being prudish or of censorship,
> or of being anti-wiki. But if we want to attract mature editors, women
> editors, editors from outside the majority cultures on Wikipedia, and
> serious readers, this kind of thing is obviously very off-putting. So
> we risk limiting our reach by not dealing with it.
>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l em lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list