[Foundation-l] moderation soft limit
mateus.nobre at live.co.uk
Tue Oct 25 17:46:04 UTC 2011
I think it's relative (like everything, anyway)
When we were discussing about image filter I remember over one hundred-mails. It was a good discussion. It would be hilarious if someone speak ''Hey everybody, we exceed the thirty messages soft limit, let's end this discussion right now.'' :P
Some debates are big and the consensus doesn't come easy, what could we do? Suddenly stop?
A ''soft'' limit is always great, but in some cases is not applicable.
Wikimedia Brasil - MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects
(+55) 85 88393509
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0100
> From: dgerard at gmail.com
> To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] moderation soft limit
> On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. <jayen466 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
> > Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
> > contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that
> > our illustrations, just like our texts, should follow good practice
> > established in reliable sources here:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=457335488#Statement_by_Jayen466
> And the AC summarised theirs: 0 accept, 6 decline. As tends to happen
> when people go forum-shopping.
> - d.
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l