[Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

Kim Bruning kim at bruning.xs4all.nl
Mon Oct 10 18:03:03 UTC 2011

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:49:04PM +0100, David Gerard wrote:
> On 10 October 2011 18:37, Kim Bruning <kim at bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > I think that having the image blurring system, combined with an option to unblur,
> > would get us very far towards the stated board directive, and I don't think
> > many in the community would object, and we could reach consensus fairly quickly.
> Not sure the blurring system would do the job for a workplace. At a
> distance, the blurred penis still looks exactly like a penis ...

Fair dinkum. We could have a "blur or black-out" option for
different occaisions. For further discussion, I think MZMcBride
was suggesting centralising discussion at mediawiki.org or meta.

	Kim Bruning

More information about the foundation-l mailing list