[Foundation-l] Commons as an art gallery?

[Béria Lima]

I would like to question something:

Why you people are not discussing that in commons? Because here people
can give opinions, in Gendergap mailing list too, but the people who can
actually change the policy are the commons editors.

So, is not better spend all that talk in the wiki?

_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer.***


2011/5/16 Andreas Kolbe <jayen466 em yahoo.com>

> Neil posted the following on Commons-l* and asked for it to be
> cross-posted here: --
>
> * See http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2011-May/006038.html
> * Also see
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2011-May/006036.html for a
> longer post by Neil on the image
>
>
> ---o0o---
>
> On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
> > This is really a Foundation topic though. Are projects' main pages there
> to
> > showcase Wikimedians' fine art?
>
> No. This is a non-issue.
>
>
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose
>
> "Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational
> purpose: [...]
>    * Self-created artwork without obvious educational use."
>
> QED.
>
> Someone else cross-post this to Foundation-L... I have assiduously
> avoided subscribing there and don't plan to now.
>
>
> --
> Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ) <neilk at wikimedia.org>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l em lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>