No subject

much, if any of it, would be considered free by our definition.  They only
seem to care that the artist was fine with being recorded at the show, and
there's certainly no release to do anything you want to do with the
recording, like there would have to be with a CC-BY-SA release.

The music there is free beer, but you couldn't say, use it commercially or
sell albums of it without falling afoul of the copyright law.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:31 AM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> > What about the Internet Archive? They certainly have much more free
> > content than us, if you just count bytes.
>
> The Internet Archive has many subprojects which are non-free content
> (wayback machine) and dubious content (Open source books).
>
> Their Live Music Archive and Moving image collection may be bigger in
> terms of bytes.
>
> I'm less confident in the Moving image collection, as they dont
> explain why the items are PD.  e.g.
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2011/June#Lycanthropus
>
> --
> John Vandenberg
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>