[Foundation-l] Board resolutions on controversial content and images of identifiable people

[Alec Conroy]

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> The resolution could be read as CYA - an intentionally deflective
> statement with no concrete impact.

I feel that basically _is_ the role of the board.   I feel like my
dream board personified is a little like a judo master.   When push to
rule on a dispute, usually they should pull that energy and
productively deflect that energy back to the community.

No concrete impact is all we need from the board on this.  Status quo
works great.

(also, there is the enactment of "Not Censored" at the foundation level. )

Alec