[Foundation-l] Black market science

[Thomas Morton]

>
> On the other hand, PLoS (plos.org - the public library of science) is
> a great journal publisher that reviews and publishes scientific work
> under a free license.  [They impose even fewer restrictions on reuse
> than Wikimedia, using CC-BY, which is a more appropriate license in my
> opinion for novel and scientific work.]
>
>
At the very least we should evangalise publishers such as this as a great
place to look for specialist sources (for Wikipedia etc.); often I find
myself limited to using paid-access sources and I always feel frustrated by
this.

Free and open journals are awesome, and any opportunity to make use of them
should be encouraged.

Tom