[Foundation-l] retire the administrator privilege

[Béria Lima]

>
> *The closest thing that i found to my proposal is what happens in the
> Portuguese Wikipedia, which has the "Deleters" group (it has a lovely name
> in Portuguese - "Eliminadores").
> *


Well, in Portuguese Wikipédia we don't want to spit the adm flag to destroy
it. We are only give the chance to someone who only wants to do a part of
the Administrator work can help the community without have to pass for all
process of be a administrator.

What you propose is create a "protector", a "blocker" and a "Media Wiki
editor" to go with the "Deleters" group and exting the adm flag. That was
never in discussion in pt.wiki
_____
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt/>
(351) 963 953 042

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer.*


2011/1/15 Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni em mail.huji.ac.il>

> 2011/1/15 geni <geniice em gmail.com>:
> > On 15 January 2011 15:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni em mail.huji.ac.il>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Now, fight.
> >
> >  First review the discussion that has already taken place at WT:RFA
>
> I suppose that you refer to the English Wikipedia. This list is about
> more than just the English Wikipedia.
>
> Before writing that proposal i reviewed many, many pages of "RFA is
> broken" discussions not just in the English Wikipedia, but in Hebrew,
> Russian and Catalan ones, too. Nowhere have i found a proposal to dump
> the concept of adminship completely and to split it into several
> roles, although i admit that i didn't read all the archives through.
> The closest thing that i found to my proposal is what happens in the
> Portuguese Wikipedia, which has the "Deleters" group (it has a lovely
> name in Portuguese - "Eliminadores").
>
> The discussions that i did read say that RfA *process* is broken
> because the questions are repetitive, because the nominees are not
> required to identify themselves, because there's no provisional
> adminship, because the desysopping process is dysfunctional, because
> the bureaucrats' cabal decides whatever it wants without regard to
> discussion etc.
>
> I say that that the "A" in RFA shouldn't exist.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l em lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>