[Foundation-l] Licenses' biodiversity : my big disagreement with the Wikimedia usability initiative's software specifications

[Teofilo]

2011/2/21 geni <geniice at gmail.com>:
> On 21 February 2011 19:45, Teofilo <teofilowiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/2/21 geni <geniice at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Can't images are again CC-BY-SA and not compatible
>>
>> What if the Creative Commons guru issues a statement saying that TVL
>> is Creative Commons 4.0 ?
>
> Why on earth should they do that?
>
> CC has actual lawyers and people who think about copyright rather a
> lot. They also have no reason to switch from a generalist license
> (which is what CC-BY-SA is) to a specialist license (which is what
> your video license would be).

CC is already including some specialist concerns when it says "For the
avoidance of doubt, where the Work is a musical work, performance or
phonogram, the synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with a
moving image ("synching") will be considered an Adaptation for the
purpose of this License." While it is rather unnecessary for
architects or sculptors, it adresses the specific needs of audio
creators.