[Foundation-l] How SOPA will hurt the free web and Wikipedia
Mateus Nobre
mateus.nobre at live.co.uk
Wed Dec 14 18:23:55 UTC 2011
> What did WMF do when WikiLeaks domains were seized and its fundraising
> payment processors (PayPal, Visa, MasterCard) were cut off? Did WMF protest
> against Internet censorship? No.
Wikimedia defends itself, not the ''justice in America and worldwide''. Remember we are not a political party. But we have to defend ourselves.
It's not against internet censorship. It's pretty clear, It's about defending us.
_____________________
MateusNobre
MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects
(+55) 85 88393509
30440865
> From: emijrp at gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:08:38 +0100
> To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] How SOPA will hurt the free web and Wikipedia
>
> Hi all;
>
> Looks like Wikimedia Foundation is very worried about censorship and the
> cut off of fundraising payment processors. Now.
>
> What did WMF do when WikiLeaks domains were seized and its fundraising
> payment processors (PayPal, Visa, MasterCard) were cut off? Did WMF protest
> against Internet censorship? No.
>
> WMF did nothing. Well, Wikipedia community wrote this disclaimer "WikiLeaks
> is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation"[1] on the
> top, and turned a blind eye.
>
> Now it is your turn. Enjoy.
>
> Regards,
> emijrp
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks
>
> 2011/12/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com>
>
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jay Walsh <jwalsh at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > Today the Wikimedia Foundation posted an important update on how the Stop
> > > Online Piracy Act (SOPA) legislation being considered in DC this week
> > > threatens an open and free web, and particularly how it threatens
> > Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > The post is authored by WMF's General Counsel, Geoff Brigham, and can be
> > > found here:
> > >
> > http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/12/13/how-sopa-will-hurt-the-free-web-and-wikipedia/
> > >
> >
> > "Under the new bill, there is one significant improvement. The new
> > version exempts U.S. based companies – including the Wikimedia
> > Foundation – from being subject to a litigation regime in which rights
> > owners could claim that our site was an “Internet site dedicated to
> > theft of U.S. property.” Such a damnation against Wikimedia could
> > have easily resulted in demands to cut off our fundraising payment
> > processors. The new version now exempts U.S. sites like ours."
> >
> > I am genuinely not anti-american. The logic here does escape me though.
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list