[Foundation-l] Study of Controversial Content

Steven Walling steven.walling at gmail.com
Thu Sep 16 22:11:27 UTC 2010


David,

Not quite sure what you mean by "ratcheted up"? Could you clarify?

Thanks,

Steven Walling

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:51 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 September 2010 22:35, R M Harris <rmharris at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> As promised, the draft report on our study of Controversial Content on Wikimedia projects is now available at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2010_Wikimedia_Study_of_Controversial_Content.  We're actually planning to release the study on that page in three segments, with a day or two in between This first one discusses the general principles that animated our observations and recommendations. We are very interested in your comments, and will be monitoring them carefully. Your feedback will be built into the report we eventually make to the Board in early October. And thanks to all for the welcoming reception we've been given since our appearance in late June. These are difficult questions to deal with, as you all know -- your openness has made it easier for us to do so.  Robert Harris and Dory Carr-Harris.
>
>
> Please detail the steps to be taken to ensure this is not ratcheted up.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list