[Foundation-l] Proposal for new projects

John Vandenberg jayvdb at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 23:30:11 UTC 2010

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Michael Snow <wikipedia at frontier.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/2010 4:12 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Pharos<pharosofalexandria at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Perhaps an alternative strategy could be to hold a grand round-robin
>>> vote to launch one new project per year, at least in beta phase.
>>> This might ensure that the very best ideas get through and are
>>> actualized, without quite opening the floodgates.
>> I like the idea of one 'beta' per year.
>> Before starting these betas, we should have a rough process for how we
>> decide when to kill an unsuccessful beta.  An RFC on meta?
> Should the parallel processes require comparable levels of agreement for
> starting or shutting down a project? That would seem fair.

I'm not following you.

Are you referring to existing processes for starting/killing

Could you expand/rephrase?

John Vandenberg

More information about the foundation-l mailing list