[Foundation-l] Legal requirements for sexual content -- help, please!

Ilario Valdelli valdelli at gmail.com
Fri May 14 15:58:51 UTC 2010


On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ilario Valdelli <valdelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Except the case that you make a photo of yourself. In this case the
>> OTRS ticket is not important like is not important in the point of
>> view of copyright.
>>
>> In any case what means "injurious"? It can change in relation of the
>> cultural point of view but also in relation of the environment where
>> the photo has been made (i.e. a picture taken in a nudist beach cannot
>> be considered "injurious").
>>
>> Ilario
>
> It can't be? I think you (and Jussi-Ville) have a pretty narrow
> concept of what might be injurious. If you release an image of
> yourself to your friends, does that mean you'd be happy to see it on
> the evening news? If you're tanning on the beach, is that permission
> to have your image republished in a major feature film? Your argument
> addresses what you believe the photographer should be allowed to do,
> but ignores the potential for negative impact on the subject of the
> photograph. That's pretty unfortunate.

Please understand that one matter is the privacy, another is the
injury for publication of nudism.

We are speaking about nudism, probably the question of privacy must be
solved in another discussion.

I mean that solving the problem of nudism you don't solve the problem
of privacy *in general* but I am not saying that the privacy is not
important.

>
> Surely there is a way to meet educational goals without risking the
> privacy or abuse of content subjects? There is tension between
> cultural values, obviously, and some self-serving interpretation of
> that tension (everyone seems to think they are being pressured to
> abide by the values of the misguided), but there must be some middle
> ground that allows for some minimal effective protection for people
> who are not party to the armchair philosophical debate.
>
> Nathan
>

Most of all because the nudism is relative to the culture.

Ilario



More information about the foundation-l mailing list