[Foundation-l] Legal requirements for sexual content -- help, please!

[Ilario Valdelli]

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of her making tea.
>
> Requiring an OTRS release from the model for any nude and sexually explicit content seems appropriate to me.
>
> Andreas
>

Except the case that you make a photo of yourself. In this case the
OTRS ticket is not important like is not important in the point of
view of copyright.

In any case what means "injurious"? It can change in relation of the
cultural point of view but also in relation of the environment where
the photo has been made (i.e. a picture taken in a nudist beach cannot
be considered "injurious").

Ilario