[Foundation-l] inadequate frame Re: Statement on appropriate educational content

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro at gmail.com
Sat May 8 12:32:37 UTC 2010


Samuel Klein wrote:
> Wow, I go offline for half a day and all commons breaks loose...
>
> Why have in-use artworks been deleted?  Even the strongest versions of
> the proposed policy that Jimbo started at Commons:Sexual_content
> explicitly supports art and illustrations.
>
>
>   
I think the clearest edge case was a Decadent Movement
artist, whom Jimbo "the art critic" decided was after all
just old porn.


Yours,

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen




More information about the foundation-l mailing list