[Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

[Thomas Dalton]

On 7 May 2010 21:42, Amory Meltzer <amorymeltzer at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is nuts.  Literally, nothing has changed.  Stuff on Wikimedia
> sites needs to be either educational or aimed at furthering the goals
> of the project and the foundation.  We don't host articles about my
> her breasts or his penis, and we don't need to host images of them
> either.  Arguing otherwise is just looking for a webhost.

1) That argument doesn't apply to old artwork. 2) It is for the
community to decide what is and isn't educational, not Jimmy. (The
board acting collectively could overrule the community, but they don't
seem to have done that.)