[Foundation-l] Discussion Questions for Potentially-Objectionable Content

[David Gerard]

On 22 July 2010 21:01, teun spaans <teun.spaans at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think I am completely factual. After I wrote this, I went to the
> questionlist and found the cry "we dont censor" in one of the
> reactions. Which proves my point, I think. You yourself use that term
> in your email.


Well, we don't. You appear to be claiming that making this factually
obvious statement somehow negates an argument. It doesn't.

Our mission - Wikimedia's bias - is that more information is better
than less information.

And "filtering" when applied by a third party is what censorship is.

Claiming that factual statements are logical fallacies is unconvincing
and will do you no good.


- d.