[Foundation-l] Boycott in ace at wiki

[Oliver Keyes]

I don't think any community, even one from a majority Muslim nation, could
reasonably consider following the doctrine of a particular Islamic sect with
no other considerations "neutral". Anyone who things "neutral point of view"
means "consider the ONE ACCEPTABLE POINT OF VIEW TO US AS INDIVIDUALS" is
barking.

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Pavlo Shevelo <pavlo.shevelo at gmail.com>wrote:

> Oh well, if any community is completely free to define what is neutral...
> :(
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Prodego <prodego at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are some constraints on what is written - it is supposed to be a
> > neutrally presented encyclopedia. But if a particular wiki's community
> comes
> > to a different conclusion than another on what is neutral than another,
> who
> > is to say which one is "right"?  'What is neutral?' is one of the
> > things collaborative editing is supposed to determine.
> >
> > Prodego
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>