[Foundation-l] Boycott in ace at wiki

[wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk]

The [[Piss Christ]] article seems to have no real purpose other than to
display an image that is known to offend. I note that none of the
references in that article actually display the image and are far more
informative of the actual controversy surrounding the image. The
wikipedia article also does not address the image in any way which would
necessitate displaying it. There is no discussion on the lighting, or
anything else about the photograph.

One is left wondering why it is that the article [[Goatse.cx]] article
does not actually show the goatse image.



Mark Williamson wrote:
> Have you seen [[Piss Christ]]? How is that different?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 4:40 AM,  <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> John Vandenberg wrote:
>>> in the article about Jesus.
>>>
>>> If you haven't noticed, the images of Muhammad on the core articles
>>> relating to Islam are not created by someone who had a bit too much
>>> free time on their hands.  The images of Muhammad that we use are
>>> images of an object which is held in a university library or museum,
>>> _because_they_are_important_.
>>>
>> Those don't appear to be the ones that are being complained about. Its
>> the Baby Jesus Butt Plug style ones that they have issue with.
>>