[Foundation-l] 2010-11 Annual Plan Now Posted to FoundationWebsite

Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 1 17:23:12 UTC 2010


I would say the biggest reason why Wikipedia is still top dog would probably be "anyone can edit" combined with timing.




________________________________
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 9:01:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] 2010-11 Annual Plan Now Posted to FoundationWebsite

On 1 July 2010 16:57, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> Citizendium is perhaps most valuable for having
> showed us a path we should not follow--elaborate bureaucracy and
> expert editing--but  in a more positive sense did highlight the need
> for us to improve article quality.

Citizendium's bureaucracy and expert editing weren't the main reason
for its failure. The main reason was that Wikipedia already existed.
For all we know, Citizendium's approach may have been better than ours
(although personally I doubt it), but it wasn't sufficiently better
for people to switch from Wikipedia, which was already very
successful.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



      


More information about the foundation-l mailing list