[Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals with content issues.

[David Gerard]

On 1 September 2010 00:27, John Vandenberg <jayvdb at gmail.com> wrote:

> You, and the RW article about WP, start from the assertion that
> Wikipedia is successful.  Successful at what?  Success at Google
> rankings/pageviews/popular culture?  Is that the only appropriate
> measure of an encyclopedia; an encyclopedia which is putting other
> encyclopedia's out of business?  What is it unsuccessful at?  The RW
> article about WP does little to demonstrate a rational persons
> observation of WP.  It reads like the writer(s) are drunk on coolaid.


This appears to be a very inefficacious way for you to edit the wiki
page you're talking about.


- d.