[Foundation-l] Sakha Wikipedia passed 7000 articles
Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 19:27:07 UTC 2010
Hoi,
Blatant: without any attempt at concealment; completely obvious (Wordnet). I
do not need an excuse, I did better; I provided an explanation. An
explanation that you care not to accept. I have also pointed out that I am
unwilling to drop people who have helped out for opportunistic reasons.
It would be opportunistic if I give in just to appease you. There is another
meaning for blatant: conspicuously and offensively loud (also Wordnet).
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 August 2010 21:15, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 August 2010 19:13, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> I think this has already been answered. Quoting Marcus below:
> >> You try to make it appear like an attack on a single person. It's not
> >> about removing any person from the committee, we just want them to be
> >> transparent and stand to their words publicly. And it's also not a
> >> single person, it's you and one more committee member.
>
> > That is an argument I do not agree with.
>
>
> The language committee is behaving in a blatantly closed manner. You
> are not even pretending to offer an excuse for this.
>
> This is not adequate behaviour.
>
> Are you really unable to justify why you don't want your messages to be
> read?
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list